Jules Kunhardt

Series

Feathered Masterpieces

4 works

A Bar at the Folies-Bergère after Édouard Manet, redrawn with a feathered barmaid

A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, after Édouard Manet

  • A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, after Édouard Manet: Detail

    Detail

  • A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, after Édouard Manet: First sketch

    First sketch

  • A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, after Édouard Manet: Work in progress

    Work in progress

Las Meninas after Diego Velázquez, redrawn with feathered figures

Las Meninas, after Diego Velázquez

  • Las Meninas, after Diego Velázquez: Another version

    Another version

Making of

From the first lines to both versions.

Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait, redrawn with feathered figures

The Arnolfini Portrait, after Jan van Eyck

  • The Arnolfini Portrait, after Jan van Eyck: Detail: mirror and inscription

    Detail: mirror and inscription

  • The Arnolfini Portrait, after Jan van Eyck: Detail: the little dog

    Detail: the little dog

Making of

From the first sketches to the finished sheet on the easel.

Grant Wood’s American Gothic, redrawn with a rooster

American Gothic, after Grant Wood

  • American Gothic, after Grant Wood: Grant Wood’s models next to the painting: his sister Nan Wood Graham and his dentist Byron McKeeby

    Grant Wood’s models next to the painting: his sister Nan Wood Graham and his dentist Byron McKeeby

What happens when old masterpieces get an animal remake? There is a brief moment of recognition, despite the knot in your brain. I know that one! Or do I? You have to look a second time, more closely, and discover the supposedly familiar anew.

In this series I transpose well-known paintings from art history into the world of chickens. Whether Velázquez’s Las Meninas, a portrait of Edith Schiele, Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait, Manet’s A Bar at the Folies-Bergère or Grant Wood’s American Gothic – the motifs remain recognisable, but their human protagonists are replaced by chickens.

This is not only a humorous twist but also a challenge in drawing: how, for example, can the direct, often so meaningful gaze of a person be carried over to a chicken whose eyes sit on the sides of its head? How much of the original has to remain for it to be recognisable, and how much may change so that something new emerges?

Another thought appeals to me as well: over time, famous works of art sometimes take on something almost sacred. People whisper in museums, masterpieces are viewed with reverence, and the art world at times takes itself astonishingly seriously. I want to counter this solemnity with a little lightness. Art does not have to be put on a pedestal. It may also surprise, make you smile and bring joy.

Nor do I leave myself out: in Velázquez’s famous mirror I appear too – albeit as a chicken. A small reminder that I don’t want to take myself and my role as an artist too seriously. In the end, the work should speak for itself, not the artist behind it.

More series